Gerald Joe Moreno

Posts Tagged ‘Andries Krugers Dagneaux

Robert Priddy Dared Not Sue Leo Rebello

It is an irrefutable fact that Sathya Sai Baba and the Sai Organisation refuse to be dragged into Ex-Devotee’s gutter of hate, lies, smears, defamations and libels.

Despite years of unrelenting attacks by Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy. Timothy Conway, Serguei Badaev, Brian Steel, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Al & Marisa Rahm, Tony O’Clery, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson, etc., Sathya Sai Baba and the Sai Organisation have never (ever) been officially charged with any crime and not even one alleged “victim” has filed a basic police complaint, public grievance or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India (the only place where courts would have jurisdiction over the Guru as an individual defendant). This is an irrefutable statement of fact and critics of Sathya Sai Baba cannot cite any credible or legal references to support their attacks, rumors, gossips and conspiracy theories.

The only legal case filed against Sathya Sai Baba was by Alaya Rahm (the ‘Secret Swami’ superstar), who actually filed bogus suits against the wrong defendants in the wrong country (the suits were filed in the USA and not in India)! Alaya Rahm’s legal cases were all self-dismissed before they ever went to trial. See:

Brian Steel Wrote About Internet Attacks Against Sathya Sai Baba

It is interesting to note that when Brian Steel was a Sai Devotee (he is currently an Ex-Devotee), he wrote about internet attacks in his book “The Powers of Sathya Sai Baba”, Mornington, 1998. This book attempted to categorize the profuse and diverse miracles of Sathya Sai Baba that occur on a global scale. Brian Steel claimed that vibuthi manifested on his picture of Sathya Sai Baba and claimed the guru miraculously saved him from drowning. However, let us take a closer look at Brian Steel’s actual words regarding the internet attacks against Sathya Sai Baba:

Brian Steel: “The Internet allows both (or more!) sides of a topic to be examined. Nevertheless, it is wise to remember that because of freedom of access to anyone with a computer and a modem, the Web is also accessible to people with negative intentions and even to raving lunatics. Literally anyone may have his or her say. (page 158)

Naturally, the Web is also open to critics and detractors. The Indian Skeptics have their own Website and they are supported by other groups and individuals abroad with similiar aims, notably in Canada and Germany. Other groups of skeptics have Web Sites too. But Baba has a white knight on the Worldwide Web to defend Him. The well-known and indefatigable American Sai Baba devotee, Bon Giovanni, who has built up a large and important Website, makes much Baba information and opinion available and provides mnay links with overseas Sai Websites, and even a link to sites critical of Sai Baba(like the Indian Skeptics), which must surely impress even those dour individuals! The inquisitive Web surfer can even find a link on Bon’s Web Pages to an internet book by a Canadian skeptic. The book attempts to show that Sai Baba is neither omniscient or omnipotent. Fortunately, and to his enormous credit, Bon Giovanni actually debates on the ‘Net’ with such critics of Sai Baba. (page 159)

Since Baba does not usually respond to criticism of any kind, there is no fear of a libel suit and so journalists may proceed more or less with impunity to try to sow doubts on Baba’s actions and motives. (pages 150-151)”

Even Brian Steel was aware of the fact that since Sathya Sai Baba rarely responds to criticisms of any kind, people feel free to libel him because they have no fear of legal suits.

Robert Priddy’s Double Standards & Deceit Come Back To Bite Him

Robert Priddy wrote an article entitled “Sathya Sai Baba dared not sue Daily People newspaper”, in which he poorly attempted to make the argument that because the Sai Organisation did not sue the Daily People newspaper for “libel” that the stories they published must somehow be true.

On the internet, Leo Rebello has publicly claimed that Robert Priddy has AIDS, is a homosexual, is a schizophrenic and had sex with his former guru (Refs: 0102). Robert Priddy has never attempted to sue Leo Rebello for “libel”, so what must we infer from Robert Priddy’s inaction? That Leo Rebello’s accusations are true? Using the very same standards that Robert Priddy used against Sathya Sai Baba, the answer is “yes”! Robert Priddy “dared not sue” Leo Rebello for “libel” and Priddy’s inaction strongly implies that Rebello’s accusations have merit to them.

Thank you Mr. Priddles for setting the standard and implicating yourself in the process!

Ex-Devotee’s employ a entire slew of double standards and reprehensible tactics against Sathya Sai Baba, the Sai Organization, Sai Devotees and Pro-Sai Activists. However, if one were to turn the tables on Ex-Devotee’s they would be implicated in the very same reprehensible behaviors they attribute to others.

Robert Priddy is being dealt with now and as one can see, dealing with him requires no huge effort. It is obvious that Robert Priddy must sense the irremediable inferiority of his arguments and that is why he is so frenzied to create an untrue and injurious impression of those who disagree with his hate-based agendas. Perhaps the most disturbing part to Robert Priddy’s harangues is his astonishing ability to tell pathological lies with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. Robert Priddy has trained himself well in the art of rhetoric and he has apparently amazed and dazed some people with his nostril-flaring ability. Moreno remains unimpressed.

Robert Priddy – The Con Artist:

Needless to say, Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?


ExBaba Webmaster RFJ Sandt Libels Gerald Joe Moreno As Being Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Reinier van der Sandt (who was recently exposed for massive copyright infringement) is the webmaster and registrant for the largest Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba domains on the world wide web. Reinier van der Sandt owns and operates around twenty known Anti-Baba websites, webpages, blogs and/or groups.

On February 22nd 2010, Reinier van der Sandt (the “ExBaba Admin”) officially came forward and publicly libeled Gerald Joe Moreno as being “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba ( When the webmaster and registrant for the largest Anti-Baba domains has the temerity to publicly disperse fabricated and fraudulent sexual abuse allegations against Gerald Joe Moreno, what does this say about the “integrity”, “crediblity” and “honesty” of the ExBaba Domain (which is universally cited as a “credible” source by Ex-Devotees and critics of Sai Baba)?

The following screencap documents Reinier van der Sandt’s falsified and fraudulent “sexual abuse” claims against Gerald Moreno:

Reinier van der Sandt Libels Gerald Joe Moreno As Being Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Reinier van der Sandt Libels Gerald Joe Moreno As Being Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Relevant Text:
Publication date: February 22, 2010
By: Ex Baba Admin (Reinier van der Sandt)

Gerald Joe Moreno was abused by Sai Baba, but just like more of Baba’s victims, he refuses to see the event as an ‘abuse’, nevertheless, we know that this is a normal way to deal with such peculiar but nasty and dreadful actions that happen on male devotees in Puttaparthi or Bangalore, and so he just belongs to the group of abused victims of Sathya Sai Baba.

If he agrees or not, he was: sexually abused, and he knows what abuse is, because he admits that Sathya Sai Baba is in fact sexually abuse men, here in Moreno’s own words;

SSB did sexually abuse men.

On you can read more about how this works, Basava Premanand has a clear view on Moreno’s situation.

Moreno is hopelessly trying refute the fact that he was abused, well, what initially happens with every abused victim actually and what must be seen as sexual abuse, happens on him too, here we may read that in his own words:

You see, the lower stomach lies in the area just above the male genitalia and by performing that ceremony – the trousers have to be lowered first – Sai Baba can easily get access just by looking at the the sexual organ, in order to measure up the format and state of the man’s penis, this, we conclude, is already a sexual abuse !

Please take notice of Robert Priddy’s opinion on the abuse of Gerald Joe Moreno:

Important are these words Priddy writes: ‘Moreno did not perceive it as such, but few who go into the private room behind closed doors believing Sathya Sai Baba to be a divinity seldom do.

Additionally we may write down here, that Moreno might have changed the text in his advantage, which came from the original ‘Personal Geocities Website’ as he states, but which can’t be obtained, because the website isn’t there anymore.

From the above we may conclude that Gerald Joe Moreno was indeed sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba from India, which already happened on Joe’s 18th in 1988 !

Gerald Joe Moreno Was NEVER Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Needless to say, Gerald Joe Moreno has been refuting Ex-Devotee’s repetitive “sexual molestation” libels going back to July 2006:

Gerald Joe Moreno’s GeoCities Webpages

Joe Moreno’s GeoCities webpages were online from late 2001 through October 27th 2009 (when GeoCities officially closed down). indexed Moreno’s GeoCities webpages from October 18th 2003 to March 8th 2008. Moreno had block his GeoCities website on October 21st 2009 due to screencap fraud perpetrated by Robert Priddy, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Reinier van der Sandt.

www0db0www Formerly Archived And Blocked On October 21st 2009 Due To Screencap Fraud

www0db0www Formerly Archived And Blocked On October 21st 2009 Due To Screencap Fraud

Gerald Moreno published his interview experience (as duplicated from his GeoCities webpage) on his sathyasaibaba WordPress blog on May 1st 2008 (Reference) and made full screencaps to the page as well (Reference).

Reinier van der Sandt was the very first person who went about screencapturing Moreno’s GeoCities webpages in January 2005 and even published Moreno’s GeoCities picture on (which was deleted after a complaint filed by Moreno). Therefore, Reinier van der Sandt knew about and screencaptured Moreno’s GeoCities webpages from at least January 2005 through October 27th 2009 (the date when Geocities officially closed down). So when Reinier van der Sandt claimed that Moreno may have changed information on his GeoCities webpages, he is lying through his teeth.

Prior to the close of GeoCities, neither Conny Larsson, Robert Priddy or Reinier van der Sandt claimed that Moreno changed the information on his GeoCities webpages. Now that GeoCities closed, Reinier van der Sandt is claiming that Moreno may have changed information on his GeoCities webpages!

Since Conny Larsson & Robert Priddy claim to possess full screencaps to Moreno’s GeoCities webpages, why don’t they show where Moreno changed the text? The fact of the matter is that Larsson, Priddy & Sandt adamantly refuse to publish the full screencaps they claim they possess (despite an open challenge by Moreno) for reasons left unknown.

Renier van der Sandt Is A Known Con Man

It is an irrefutable fact that Reinier van der Sandt is a known fraud and a pathological liar. One small example (out of dozens): RFJ Sandt used numerous fake names on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group. RFJ Sandt fully acknowledged using fake names and said:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Allright, you win, Joe (Gerald) Moreno is right… I have made these pages, and Joe is right, all the YAHOO ID’s and the IP are mine, I use them to show my view on the truth, but I will change this, in future I will be only using my name on these sites and the different ID’s will be deleted by me, ok?” (Reference)

The following list of fraudulent names were the ones used by RFJ van der Sandt on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group (with which Sandt conversed with himself and even praised himself!):

  • sloppyjoemoreno (26 posts)
  • webmasterexbabacom (5 posts)
  • rvdsandt2003 (200 posts)
  • rvdsandt2004 (112 posts)
  • end_of_baba (12 posts)
  • rapistanddemonsathyasaibaba (336 posts)
  • neutral_individual (6 posts)
  • finddewittinthepizza (2 posts)
  • reiniervandersandt (298 posts)
  • reiniervdsandt (204 posts)
  • truthaboutbaba (42 posts)

This is the type of con-man that is trying to make the case that Joe Moreno was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba.

RFJ Sandt Admissions & Disturbing Views About Child Pornography

Reinier van der Sandt openly admitted to looking for child porn websites to see how easy they were to find! Reinier van der Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites – as what I have seen of it – have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…” (Reference)

WHY would Reinier van der Sandt want to peruse any porn site and enlarge thumbnail pictures of children being sexually abused? Perhaps this has to do with RFJ Sand’s self-admission of having a pornography problem that settingcaptivesfree helped him overcome? As if this isn’t disgusting enough, R.V.D. Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay.” (Reference)

Reinier vander Sandt tried to justify viewing illegal child porn sites by saying:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet – NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!” (Reference)

Apparently Reinier Van Der Sandt found the “filthy kiddie porno” he sought. But that was not enough! RVD Sandt found lots of kiddie porno sites”, “wanted to continue and see more” and even tried to enlarge pictures of children being sexually abused! Reinier Van Der Sandt justified his behavior by saying what he did was alright because he was “not a customer”! RVD Sandt is saying it is OKAY to view child pornography as long as you are not a “customer”! The IWF specifically states that child pornography is illegal content!

This is the type of pervert that is trying to make the case that Joe Moreno was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. Apparently, porn-addict Reinier van der Sandt is projecting his pornographic fantasies onto Moreno.

To Date: Pseudo-Moralists Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy adamantly refuse to say one word about Reinier Van Der Sandt’s admissions to viewing illegal child pornography, using fake names and having a pornography addiction.

ExBaba Sexual Abuse Libels – In Conclusion

The big question left unanswered:

What other sexual abuse allegations are Reinier van der Sandt, Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, Alan Kazlev, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and the Ex-Baba Domain fabricating and falsifying against Sathya Sai Baba like they did against Moreno?

To Date: Not even one Anti-Sai Activist has come forward reprimanding Ex-Devotees for their fraudulent, falsified and gutter accusations against Moreno, proving that the Anti-Sai Movement is thoroughly corrupt and relies on fanatic devotion to an Anti-Sai agenda that is based on subterfuge, deceit and blatant dishonesty.

Critics like Timothy Conway, Serguei Badaev, Brian Steel, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Lisa Tice, Hans de Kraker, Dennis Hanisch, David Lyons, Reidun Priddy, Al & Marisa Rahm, Barbara Shocket and Dhanyi Jo Sinclair, etc., publicly endorse these shameless liars and are thereby guilty through association and guilty through silence with those making fraudulent and falsified sexual abuse libels against Moreno.

Gerald Joe Moreno Archives

Gerald Joe Moreno Categories