Gerald Joe Moreno

Posts Tagged ‘Sai

Robert Priddy And The Amateur Agnostic Nitwit Nastik

In the never-ending hypocrisy that altogether exemplifies the Anti-Sai movement, Robert Priddy and an anonymous person using the name “Nitwit Nastik” (or “NitwitNastik”) have joined forces in a crusade for rationality, skepticism, science, agnosticism and Anti-Sai activism!

First Things First: Defining “Nitwit Nastik”:

Nitwit: Noun: A stupid or silly person. (Reference)
Nastik: Can refer to “Nastika”, Indian philosophical schools and persons that do not accept the authority of the Vedas as supreme. “Nastika” is often translated as “atheist”. (Reference)

Consequently, “Nitwit Nastik” literally means “a stupid or silly atheist”. How apropos! NitwitNastik defines himself as an “amateur agnostic”, belongs to an online group of Indian Atheists, is entirely anonymous, has a rather queer propensity to slur and malign people belonging to the faith of Islam, is an admirer of the defamer and conspiracy theorist Robert Priddy and is an admirer of the foul-mouthed George Carlin (Ref).

Nitwit Nastik’s Anonymous Status Called Into Question:

Robert Priddy viciously attacked Pro-Sai activists when they desired to maintain anonymity and called them (Ref):

  • “cowardly creatures hiding under a stone”
  • “cowardly and cheap slanderers”
  • “chicken-livered”
  • “below contempt for the whole world of decent people out here”

It is “pitiful” that Nitwit Nastik cannot live up to Robert Priddy’s standards and does not have “the courage to stand forth like a man” and divulge his true identity.

This is yet another perfect example of Robert Priddy’s laughable hypocrisy in which he demands full names from Pro-Sai Activists, yet makes no demands for full names from Anti-Sai Activists. Robert Priddy was also caught posting anonymously on QuickTopic using the names “bandbox” and “Lisa demoniser” (Ref). Robert Priddy is a brazen deceiver and an obvious phony who can’t back up his precept with practice.

Nitwit Nastik And True Believer Robert Priddy:

Nitwitnastik exclusively references links to atheistic and skeptical material on his wordpress blog. Amusingly, Nitwit Nastik also linked to Robert Priddy’s Anti-Sai-Baba blog because he apparently was duped into thinking that Robert Priddy is actually a skeptic who promotes scientific thought! Well, Nitwit Nastik is in for a rude awakening.

Although Robert Priddy attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, he is actually a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend of various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for and other “lunatic fringe” Baba bashers.

Robert Priddy promotes, endorses and/or professes friendship with:

  1. Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson
  2. Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway
  3. New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev
  4. Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’
  5. Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann
  6. Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani
  7. Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp

As a matter of fact, when Robert Priddy attempts to defend himself against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) he directs his readers to either:

  1. Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s website (located at
  2. Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev’s website (located at

How’s that for “scientific” or “rational”? Robert Priddy is obviously a very gullible and naive “true believer” who is willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, seance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by him (a so-called “scholar” and “academic” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy adamantly refuses to say one word about his promotion and endorsement of these “lunatic fringe” (Priddy’s favorite slur) individuals.

Robert Priddy was also a promoter of LSD and eulogized his own LSD-induced hallucinations for well over 30+ years! See:

  1. Robert Priddy’s Removal Of Biographical Data From Personal Website
  2. Robert Priddy’s Biographical Suppression
  3. Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive 01)
  4. Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive 01)
  5. Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive 01)
  6. Robert Priddy’s 30+ Year Glorification Of LSD

And to top it all off, Robert Priddy believes (even to this day, after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers.

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, it will surely surprise some that I am still almost certain – on the basis of extended personal observation – that Sathya Sai Baba can and does carry out apports, which therefore can appear as materialisations from nothing.”

Apports are said to be physical objects in existence that are dematerialized from one location and rematerialized to another.

Robert Priddy: “Some of what I experienced of SSB’s extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.”

Robert Priddy believes that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers because the Guru cured him of a debilitating and chronic neck and spinal problem that no one else could cure and whose symptoms no doctor could alleviate. Robert Priddy claimed that Sathya Sai Baba cured him through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine, which was supported by x-rays and the testimony of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”).

Robert Priddy also claimed that Sathya Sai Baba freed his mother from chronic pain and that a small speck of Sathya Sai Baba’s vibuthi instantaneously cured his paralyzed cat when it suffered from what appeared to be a stroke.

Robert Priddy tries to make the case that Sathya Sai Baba:

  • Is both a fraud and genuine.
  • Both can materialize objects and fakes materializations.
  • Both can cure diseases but really can’t cure diseases.

Trying to pass himself off as an intellectual who currently holds rationalistic beliefs, Robert Priddy miserably fails to explain away the enigma of Sathya Sai Baba. Instead, Robert Priddy appears very confused, conflicted and non-intelligent and ends up sticking his foot further into his mouth with his never-ending and very amusing equivocations.

Consequently, NitwitNastik is promoting superstition and lunatic fringe beliefs by holding hands and associating himself with true believer Robert Priddy. Of course, I submitted a comment to NitWitNastik’s blog revealing these facts but he did not publish it and instead chose to protect Robert Priddy.

How ironic: Robert Priddy protected and promoted by an “amateur” and a nitwit! A double whammy.

Sathya Sai Organisation Needs No Defense

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) said the following about Dr G Venkataraman and Joe Moreno’s defense of the Sathya Sai Organisation:

Robert Priddys Ridiculous Claims About The Sathya Sai Organisation

Robert Priddys Ridiculous Claims About The Sathya Sai Organisation

Robert Priddy: “Despite Moreno’s oyymoronic claim that the Sathya Sai Organization needs no defending, it has been defended by Dr. G. Venkarataman of Radio Sai and also massively by Moreno himself. This defense was done because of documented evidence and testimony on a large scale of its unaccountability, planned disinformation and deceptions of the public, covering up and ignoring crimes, including murder and sexual molestations of which all its leaders are aware. They have failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandatory reporting.”

It is entirely true that the Sathya Sai Organisation does not need to be defended from any bona-fide or legal complaints because none have ever been filed with the police or courts of law in India.

The only defenses offered by Dr G Venkataraman and Joe Moreno for the Sai Organisation are those that expose the massive fraudulence of critic’s smear, disinformation, hate and defamation campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba on the internet.

Robert Priddy said that the Sai Organisation “failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandated reporting” regarding allegations of sexual abuse (an argument parroted by Barry Pittard). Actually, the only people who have “failed to exercise duty of care and ignored mandated reporting” regarding sexual abuse are alleged victims and their mothers and fathers who have all (without exception) failed and refused to file a single police complaint, court case or public grievance in India against Sathya Sai Baba. These irrefutable facts strongly argue that Sathya Sai Baba never abused anyone and alleged victim’s accounts are highly unbelievable and come from non-credible sources.

The big question that Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard and other critics continually ignore is:

WHY should the Sai Organisation resort to the legalistic process of “mandated reporting” regarding internet rumors when all of the alleged victims (without exception) and all of their mothers, fathers and relatives (without exception) have all failed and refused to resort to the legalistic process of “mandated reporting” themselves against the Sai Organisation?

Robert Priddy’s argument is reverse logic. Instead of harping on the legal and moral duties of the Sai Organisation, he should be focusing on the legal and moral duties of alleged victims and their mothers and fathers (all of whom have never filed any sort of legalistic complaints in India against Sathya Sai Baba).

Priddy’s argument is akin to accusing a person of theft, demanding that the thief publicly repent and turn himself into the police although there are no police complaints or court cases alleging theft!

Robert Priddy can interpret Moreno’s exposure of his embarrassing lies as a “defense” of the Sai Organisation if he so chooses. In fact, if anyone is defending the Sai Organisation, it is Robert Priddy! Why? Because Robert Priddy’s claims are so exaggerated, his pathos so caricatured, his libels so brazen, his arguments so flawed, his bitterness so palpable, his hissy fits so shrieking, no one in his/her right mind can believe anything Robert Priddy has to say against the Sathya Sai Organisation.

Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate and publicly defends Alaya Rahm (the prime interviewee on the Secret Swami Documentary) although Alaya self-disclosed (in official court records) that he was a college drop-out and a decade-long daily-user of illegal street drugs and alcohol seeking a large money settlement from the Sathya Sai Baba Society Of America! The end result of Alaya’s court case: Self-Dismissed With Prejudice! Robert Priddy is also a fierce defender, promoter and associate of Conny Larsson, an ex-devotee turned self-professed Prophet and Psychic Trance Medium! And to top it all off, Robert Priddy fabricated sexual molestation claims against Moreno. If Robert Priddy has the temerity to falsify sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other stories of sexual molestation is he falsifying as well?

Thank goodness that very few revel in Robert Priddy & Barry Pittard’s bigoted campaigns to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. The only defense the Sai Organisation requires is against the voluminous lies, conspiracies, propaganda and rhetoric dispersed against it by people who have shown themselves (time and again) to be pathological prevaricators.

Al Rahm’s Email To Gerald Joe Moreno – A Response To Internet Proxy Barry Pittard

Barry Pittard (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) wrote an article babbling about Al Rahm’s Explanatory Letter To Gerald Joe Moreno. Barry Pittard accused Moreno of being a “Sathya Sai Baba Internet Proxy”. If the argument of being an “internet proxy” is supposed to compromise Moreno’s arguments, then Barry Pittard shot himself in the foot because he is a self-appointed Internet Proxy & Proxy Defamer for alleged “victims”.

About Al Rahm’s explanatory letter, Barry Pittard left out highly relevant facts that would severely compromise the integrity of his arguments had he included them.

  1. First and foremost, it is noteworthy that we never hear from Alaya Rahm in these matters but rather from his parents (particularly Al Rahm) and Ex-Devotees. Alaya is now and at all times relevant has been an adult and presumably capable of expressing his own opinions and advancing his own claims. This is important to point out because one cannot truly know if Alaya’s parents or Ex-Devotees are actually or accurately expressing Alaya’s position. Since Ex-Devotees, Al Rahm and Marisa Rahm never claimed to have personally witnessed an incident of alleged molestation regarding Alaya, their assertions and comments regarding Alaya’s alleged experiences are entirely hearsay.
  2. Al Rahm also has a disturbing history of changing and exaggerating claims and comments made in association with Alaya Rahm. Even more disturbing is when Al Rahm personally lied to Gerald Joe Moreno (Ref), claiming that Basava Premanand filed a recent lawsuit against the Sai Organization (a claim that Premanand was unwilling to concede to and was apparently unaware of).
  3. In “Response To Form Interrogatories” in Alaya Rahm’s self-dismissed lawsuit against the Sathya Sai Baba Society (Form Interrogatory No. 6.3, Set One) Alaya Rahm fully admitted that he had been a daily user of illegal street drugs and alcohol from 1995 – 2005. Consequently, during Alaya Rahm’s “Divine Downfall” and India Today Anti-Sai interviews and during the filming of the BBC Documentary “Secret Swami” and the “Seduced By Sai Baba” Danish Documentary, Alaya Rahm was under the influence of illegal street drugs and alcohol while relating his alleged sexual encounters with Sathya Sai Baba. This crucial information wholly undermines Alaya Rahm’s credibility and irreparably compromises the integrity of his claims. Needless to say, Alaya Rahm’s alcoholism and drug addiction have been purposely suppressed from the general public by Anti-Sai Activists, Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy, the Rahm Family, Tanya Datta, the BBC and the media (Ref).
  4. Supporting Alaya Rahm’s involvement with illegal street drugs and drug addicts is a secondary court case in November 2007 where Alaya Rahm testified on behalf of his friend Valdez T Woods, who was arrested and convicted for possession of crack cocaine and marijuana with the intent to deliver (PDF Reference). As a matter of fact, Valdez T Woods was arrested within a mile of Alaya Rahm’s then current residence (as revealed in official court records). Alaya Rahm was identified as a “friend and associate” of drug dealer and drug addict Valdez T Woods.
  5. In pretrial discovery, Alaya Rahm claimed he suffered no psychological trauma that would have required medical or psychiatric care. Alaya identified no psychologist who had ever examined him and his parents never had Alaya undergo psychological counseling despite their repeated and boisterous claims that Alaya was “seriously sexually molested”. The only help that Alaya obtained was a 3 day seminar from the Landmark Forum on “Empowerment, self help and personal growth” that cost $795 in June 2005 (5 years after his alleged abuse and 5 months after he filed his lawsuit)! That’s it. It would appear that Al & Marisa Rahm were incredibly negligent in getting psychological help for their “seriously sexually molested” son.

Don’t expect Barry Pittard to mention any of these facts. Apparently, the testimony of a decade-long, daily-user of illegal street drugs and alcohol seeking a money settlement who suffered no emotional trauma that warranted psychological or medical care is credible in the eyes of Barry Pittard.

If Barry Pittard thinks these facts are trivial, why doesn’t he mention or discuss them? Instead, Barry Pittard blathers about Moreno, blithely tossing around terms like “defamation” and “libel” although Alaya Rahm’s drug addiction and alcoholism were self-disclosed in official court records.

Important Related Links:

Anonymous Sai Student Claiming Sexual Abuse Exposed As An Outright Fraud

Since mid-May of 2006, an anonymous person using the name “usedbybaba” surfaced on a Sathya Sai Baba-related Yahoo Group and two QuickTopic forums making numerous defamatory and criminal allegations of sexual abuse against Sathya Sai Baba. “Usedbybaba” claimed he was a former Sai Student who attended the Guru’s prestigious University and that he had sex with the Guru for 15 years because he thought he was being “purified”. Or so the story goes…

Unfolding Of A Fraud: UsedByBaba’s Numerous Fake Names

It was soon discovered that “usedbybaba” (a faceless individual with a distinct writing style) was posting very disturbing defamations and libels under multiple fake names on the internet. A partial list of fake names:

  1. abhin
  2. another ex student
  3. abusedbybaba
  4. abusedfor15years
  5. Anand krishnamurhti
  6. Angel
  7. Angelic
  8. Angeilc
  9. Anonymus
  10. baba
  11. baba mylove
  12. balarama
  13. bandbox3
  14. Barbara Dent (reposted one of her posts under her name)
  15. blldexter
  16. Chics /Sexual Victims of Divaker Mutthu Krishnan
  17. CO2000* (attempted to impersonate a real person named Lisa)
  18. CO2000 (attempted to impersonate a real person named Lisa)
  19. CO2OOO (attempted to impersonate a real person named Lisa)
  20. Divaker Mutthu Krishnan
  21. Dr.M.S.Ramakrishnan
  22. exsaistudent (posting since 2001)
  23. exsaistudents
  24. From CNN IBN
  25. GSM Prasad
  26. hariharan
  27. Jedgar
  28. Joe (attempted to impersonate Moreno)
  29. Joe 108 (attempted to impersonate Moreno)
  30. joe 108 (attempted to impersonate Moreno)
  31. Joe Moreno (attempted to impersonate Moreno)
  32. Juan
  33. ksk
  34. lalu_panju (usedbybaba)
  35. lalupanju
  37. Lisa
  38. Lisa,,with joe108 (attempted to impersonate Lisa and Moreno)
  39. Meera
  40. Meera Powar
  41. passerby
  42. piyush srivastav victims
  43. pradeep
  44. raghav
  45. ramesh
  46. ravi saluja
  47. Rumourmonger
  48. saibabagod
  49. sai baba
  50. sai kink
  51. sai observer
  52. sai ram chandrasekhar
  53. sathya
  54. Sathya Sai Baba
  55. sathyasaibaba
  56. saurabh
  57. sebastian
  58. Sexual Victims of Piyush Kumar Srivastava
  59. shaday
  60. Simon
  61. Simonbrace
  62. Simon Brace
  63. Someonenew
  64. sriram
  65. Susan Olorenshaw (a real person not involved in the Sai Controversy)
  66. The Real Truth Seeker
  67. Truth Seeker
  68. unknownstudent
  69. USB
  71. usedbylallupanju
  72. usedbylalupanju
  73. V.Prahaladh
  74. victimofsaileela
  75. victims of sai baba
  76. Victims of Sai Baba & his Pedo Gang
  77. Victimsofsaibaba,Diwaker,Devsen,Sai Giridhar,EK,
  78. X-S
  79. xstudents
  80. yugesh giri

“UsedByBaba” Exposes Himself On A Yahoo Group

After “usedbybaba” was questioned on a former Sai-related Yahoo Group, “usedbybaba” self-imploded and fully exposed himself (which Ex-Devotees tend to do when mildly provoked). The following posts reveal what kind of person “usedbybaba” truly is (“linga”, in the following posts, means “penis”):

usedbybaba: who is premanand? by the way watch your language u fu***king third rate ar88hole. you must have slept with all the guys and maybe forgot who among these is premanand. u must have molested your brother or father and blamed them for this Don’t try to tell me i am a pervert Maybe you got fu”d by BaBA. I can write worse than this and i am capable of doing more, u shit pot.Nothing except shit comes out of your mouth. Maybe you eat through your bottom. You can”t keep calling me names and expect me to take it lying. You bi”**h Who the f*ck are you to forgive me you lingam sucking swine. tell me where you are or when you come to india i will pesonally meet you if you have the guts.bitch.Did ur boy friend fu**k u in thr mouth. If i come to know who you are belive me i will get you. I remember people for life and don’t take me for granted. BAS****D” (Reference).

usedbybaba: sob sob sob sob sob. If you like the taste of linga how can you object to some one “molesting ” you. Go and taste baba’s linga . or rathnakar is free. They told me he is divorced. Is it true? if it is true you can get married to him. try him he is only in his thirties unlike BaBa the Avatar who broke his leg who is in his seventies uh eighties oh no nineties. umm i dont know .maybe he will adjust it when he knows he is going to die to suit the stories that he told. by the way baba keeps telling the boys sbout the third leg. we know of Siva’s third eye what is the third leg.ofcourse it is cock u dumm (Reference).


usedbybaba: Go hang yourself you holy shit pot.Go with your boy friend baba.Oh, i forgot you are gay. ok, go find your partner, a female one from the nearest zoo


usedbybaba: Why can”t you sleep with me. maybe you have a pole insted of a hole. wow baba will enjoy it. By the way what are you professionaly , oh i forgot that you belong to the oldest profession. Hooker (Reference).

This is the type of whacko that Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy and other Ex-Devotee’s continually cite as a credible “Sai Student” with a “compelling testimony” against Sathya Sai Baba! Since “usedbybaba” has used EIGHTY fake names, who is to say he is not fabricating other Sai Student “testimonies” incognito?

UsedByBaba Didn’t Know Sathya Sai Baba’s Age

“Usedbybaba” said about Sathya Sai Baba’s age, “BaBa the Avatar who broke his leg who is in his seventies uh eighties oh no nineties. umm i dont know”. If “usedbybaba” was really a Sai Student for 15 years, why didn’t he know Sathya Sai Baba’s age? “Usedbybaba” had no clue if Sathya Sai Baba was in his 70’s, 80’s or 90’s! On January 2nd 2007, on another Yahoo Group, “usedbybaba” said that Sathya Sai Baba was “a 75 year old man”. At the time of that posting, Sathya Sai Baba was 81 years old. Sathya Sai Baba’s 80th birthday celebration was a huge event and it was reported that over a million people attended (Ref). Just more proof that “usedbybaba” is an imposter, a fraud and a liar.

“UsedByBaba” Exposes Himself On Two QuickTopic Forums

On QuickTopic, “usedbybaba” said (using fake names): you think the so called devotees will allow anyone to invetigate. NO, THEY WILL KILL HIM. Osama must be jelous of baba for having such wonderful (killers) devotees

Hariharan: IT WAS BIT DIFFICULT PIERCING HIM SO HE WOULD JUST SUCK FOR ME I also loved inserting my penis behind baba as he liked it and though he could not take it in fully. But i am also hiv positive

Anand Krishnamurhti: Angel you f*cking ass hole can park yourself in London or wherever you live.pattinda mounay. nyan malyalai yanum. all the three of you are phedophiles.angel,joe, lisa are all 3 dogs..Behan chooth Angel,baath math kar. You Idiot, cheddi, you don’t know cheddi. The thing that you were inside you pant is cheddi -under wear.ullu ka patte, nyan bangalorilindu smarikinnu.patti,patti


Again, this is the type of whacko that Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy and other Ex-Devotee’s continually cite as a credible “Sai Student” with a “compelling testimony” against Sathya Sai Baba! Since “usedbybaba” has used EIGHTY fake names, who is to say he is not fabricating other Sai Student “testimonies” incognito?

Funny enough “usedbybaba” pretended to be another Sai Student using the name “blldexter”. Usedbybaba accidentally posted under “blldexter” and tried to delete that post but it had already been sent to email subscribers, of which Moreno was one.

Major QuickTopic Update

“UsedByBaba” Was Never Sexually Abused

Apparently, “usedbybaba” can’t make up his mind if he was really abused by Sathya Sai Baba or if he simply “shuddered” at the thought of being abused by Sathya Sai Baba. “UsedByBaba” said on the Quicktopic forum:

“Some students seem to have suffered a lot.I shudder the thought of being molested by senior students and also by baba. I would have gone bonkers.”

This post conclusively proves that “UsedByBaba” was not sexually abused although he claimed he was.

“UsedByBaba” Lied About His Age

On his Yahoo profile, “usedbybaba” claimed he was 54 years old (Ref). This means that usedbybaba would have been 18 in 1972. The Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning was founded on November 22, 1981, by Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba (Ref). Therefore, usedbybaba could not have attended Baba’s college at that time (as he claimed) because it had not yet been founded. To complicate matters, usedbybaba also claimed that he was around 40 years of age on the SSB2 Yahoo Group (Ref). The lies and contradictions never end by confused-by-baba.

“UsedByBaba” Never Attended Sathya Sai Baba’s University

It is significant to point out that the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning in Prashanti Nilayam is the only college in India to have received an “A++” rating by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (an autonomous body established by the University Grants Commission: Reference). For further proof, one can also read the Draft Report of the Peer Team on Institutional Accreditation of the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning (Deemed University) Vidyagiri, Prashanthi Nilayam – 515 134 (A.P) Visit Dates: December 2 – 4, 2002 (Reference: DOC File).

This is the esteemed University that “usedbybaba” claimed he attended. Those who have visited Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram know full well that his students speak flawless English and are reputed as some of the brightest in all of India (even receiving national awards from the President of India). All it takes is one look at the atrocious English grammar and spelling used by “usedbybaba” to know that he never attended Sathya Sai Baba’s prestigious University.

“UsedByBaba” And “Ex-Sai Student”

It is clear that “usedbybaba” is a past poster by the name “Ex-Sai Student“. When Moreno asked “usedbybaba” if he was “Ex-Sai Student”, UsedByBaba refused to respond (even though Moreno asked him four times). “Ex-Sai Student” was an anonymous and vicious Anti-Sai Activist since 2001 who publicly posted a list of 155 names of Sai Students who were allegedly abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Since 2001 – to date, not even one student on that list has come forward with any testimony, affidavit or public grievance against Sathya Sai Baba. Not even one!

Furthermore, not even one Anti-Sai Activist, Anti-Sai Media or Anti-Sai Rationalist has been able to confirm that any of those students were abused. If the list was genuine, it could literally bring down the entire Sathya Sai Organization. Strange enough, nothing has been done about the list and nothing has come from the list since 2001. Absolutely nothing! It is clear that “Ex-Sai Student” obtained a list of Sai Student names and publicly posted it anonymously because he feared being sued and imprisoned for defamation and libel. UsedByBaba continues with his vicious tactics and defamations to this day under his new fake name “usedbybaba”. These are the types of ridiculous “Sai Student” testimonies spread on the internet against Sathya Sai Baba.

The “UsedByBaba” Fraud : In Conclusion

“Usedbybaba” unapologetically called others “whores”, “pedophiles” and “hookers”. He repeatedly claimed that Moreno was making money off his websites and that Moreno was being paid to protect Sathya Sai Baba. If “usedbybaba” made all these defamations with no proof, what does this say about his defamations against Sathya Sai Baba? “Usedbybaba’s” defamations and libels against Sathya Sai Baba are just as unreliable as his defamations against others.

“UsedByBaba” is one of many anonymous, faceless and mentally unstable defamers who spread their lies on the internet against Sathya Sai Baba. UsedByBaba is even a staunch defender of the mentally unstable Christian, Barbara Dent. The tide has turned and the only people who are being “exposed” are Anti-Sai Activists themselves. UsedByBaba has been fully exposed as a fraud, defamer and bold-faced liar with proof.

Ex-Devotees carefully packaged “usedbybaba’s” words to make him appear credible. As one can see, “usedbybaba” is NOT credible whatsoever.

Ex-Devotees purposely suppress the truth because the truth does not argue in their favor. Ex-Devotees are bitterly upset that Moreno has caught them in their blatant acts of dishonesty and deceit.

“Ut sementem feceris, ita metes.”

Barry Pittard – Critic Of Sathya Sai Baba Unfit To Be A Father

Barry “Pitbull” Pittard (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who has attacked Gerald Joe Moreno extensively on his WordPress blog) has widely and pervasively solicited himself on the internet as a main spokesperson for the Anti-Sai Movement and as an “International Coordinator” to bring Sathya Sai Baba to “justice”. Barry Pittard boasted that he sent thousands of emails to people all around the world making complaints against Sathya Sai Baba (even sending a threatening email to Cooper Union at 2:36 a.m.).

On the internet, Barry Pittard has self-disclosed:

  1. His full name.
  2. His email addresss.
  3. His current home address.
  4. His full phone number.
  5. The name of his son, Sai Isa (Screencap Reference).
  6. The name of his former mate, Shanti McIvor.

Barry Pittard is:

  1. An extensively self-solicited critic of Sathya Sai Baba on the internet.
  2. A main spokesperson for the Anti-Sai Movement.
  3. An alleged “International Coordinator” for the Anti-Sai Movement.
  4. The head of “media relations” for the bogus F.D.S.S.B. (Former Devotees Of Sathya Sai Baba) “Global Coalition”.
  5. A free-press-release junkie who released his full contact details (including phone number, address and email address) on numerous free “press release” websites.
  6. An obsessive propagandist who has sent thousands of Anti-Baba emails to an entire spectrum of individuals all around the world.

Therefore, it can be abundantly evidenced that Barry Pittard is a prime participant, main spokesperson and public figure in the Sai Controversy.

Although Barry Pittard has been a vocal critic of Sathya Sai Baba since 1999, he never released a public picture of himself until April 22nd 2009 (when he was well established on the internet as a prominent critic and public figure in the Sai Controversy). The very first public picture that Barry Pittard decided to release of himself was with his son Sai Isa (Reference)!

Sai Isa is Barry Pittard’s out-of-wedlock son (whom he fathered in his late 50’s with a 20/21 year-old girl) and who was named after his former Indian Guru, Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba (whom Barry Pittard once hailed as God Incarnate). Both Shanti McIvor and Barry Pittard decided not to change Sai Isa’s name, so he still bears that name. The reason why this is so very disturbing is because Barry Pittard is currently a very vocal and vicious Anti-Sai Activist who spearheads many gutter, smear and hate campaigns against his former Guru, whom he erroneously, obsessively and fallaciously accuses of being a “serial pedophile”, “homosexual”, “fraud”, “implicated in murders”, among numerous other slurs and wholly unsupported defamations & libels. Strange enough, Barry Pittard still believes (even after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers and even claimed that the Guru foretold the birth of his son (Sai Isa) when he was allegedly observing celibacy.

Gerald Joe Moreno predicted that a day was coming fast when Sai Isa would seek the meaning and history of his name and would discover the truth about his father Barry Pittard and his history with Sathya Sai Baba. That day has since come to fruition (as acknowledged by Robert Priddy on his WordPress blog). Needless to say, Sai Isa will be scarred for life and will probably develop some sort of mental complex after being teased and bullied by others that his own father (Barry Pittard) named him after a Guru (Sathya Sai Baba) he hates, defames and constantly accuses (with no proof, mind you) of being a raping, killing and homosexual serial pedophile who runs “elite pedophile rings” and people trafficking rings throughout the world!

As if this is not bad enough, Barry Pittard actually had the egotistical audacity to publicly release his very first public picture with his son Sai Isa on MySpace (which allows internet users to duplicate, email, save, print, embed and share pictures)! This is unconscionable! Barry Pittard is unfit to be a father.

Barry Pittard is filled with blackness against his former guru Sathya Sai Baba. Since Barry Pittard’s son (i.e., ‘Sai Isa’) was named after Sathya Sai Baba, some have questioned whether Barry Pittard’s blackness has been projected on his son as well. Otherwise, why would Barry Pittard release his very first public picture with his son on his lap, release his son’s name on the internet in relation to the Sai Controversy and refuse to change his son’s name?

  1. Sai Isa is a living and breathing remnant of Barry Pittard’s history and involvement with Sathya Sai Baba.
  2. Sai Isa’s birth and gender were prophesized by Sathya Sai Baba many years before he was born.
  3. Sai Isa was conceived when Barry Pittard was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba.
  4. Sai Isa was conceived when his mother was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba.
  5. Sai Isa was named after Sathya Sai Baba.
  6. Sai Isa was used to promote Sathya Sai Baba via the BabaSlings business.
  7. Sai Isa currently lives with Barry Pittard where he is unremittingly subjected to, influenced with and brainwashed with Anti-Baba propaganda on a daily basis.
  8. Barry Pittard himself publicly released Sai Isa’s name (in relation to the Sai Controversy) on the internet (Screencap Reference).
  9. Barry Pittard himself publicly released Sai Isa’s picture on the internet and only removed it once threatened with legal action by Shanti McIvor.
  10. Barry Pittard allowed his 12 year-old son to friend sexually active lesbians and a nudist on MySpace (Reference).
  11. Barry Pittard forcibly deleted Sai Isa’s MySpace account, restricting the boy’s internet activity and further isolating him from friends.

Barry Pittard’s public smear campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba and others have already begun to affect the life of Sai Isa. Barry Pittard doesn’t care because he is an old man who has nothing to lose. Barry Pittard is obviously intent on ruining his son’s life because his son bears the name of the Guru he hates and loathes!

This from a man who allegedly wished for his son not be involved in the Sai Controversy and who actually considers himself a fit parent.

Sad. Very, very sad!

Marianne Warren – Unravelling The Enigma – Shirdi Sai Baba In The Light Of Sufism

Marianne Warren Book

Marianne Warren Book

Dr. Marianne Warren Ph.D (University of Toronto, Canada) wrote a book entitled “Unravelling The Enigma – Shirdi Sai Baba In The Light Of Sufism” (1997; Sterling Paperbacks; ISBN 81-207-2147-0. ).

Kevin Shepherd (a pseudo-philosopher, pseudo-moralist and Findhorn fanatic) selectively (some would say “dishonestly”) quoted Marianne Warren as saying:

Kevin R. D. Shepherd: “Dr. Marianne Warren was obliged to acknowledge that ‘Shepherd was the first author to question this Hindu bias….most of his arguments concerning [Shirdi] Sai Baba’s Sufi connections are strong’.”

Now, let us take a look at the full text as published in Marianne Warren’s book:

Snippet From Marianne Warren – Unravelling The Enigma Shirdi Sai Baba In The Light Of Sufism

Snippet From Marianne Warren – Unravelling The Enigma Shirdi Sai Baba In The Light Of Sufism

Marianne Warren: A harsh critique of Narasimhaswami is found in Kevin Shepherd’s monograph entitled Gurus Rediscovered: Biographies of Sai Baba of Shirdi and Upasani Maharaj of Sakori, which introduces a new and thought-provoking perception of Sai Baba. [38] His material was first drafted in 1967, but only updated and published privately in 1985. Prior to Shepherd, the perennial question was whether Sai Baba was Hindu or Muslim, with most of the secondary writers emphasizing the Hindu interpretation. Shepherd was the first author to question this Hindu bias and to redefine the broad ‘Muslim’ category, dividing it into the orthodox Islamic law or sharia and Sufi mysticism. By definition, an Islamic mystic is a Sufi, and as Sai Baba was a Muslim mystic, he was perforce a Sufi. Shepherd observes many links between Sai Baba and the strong Sufi tradition in the Deccan. He notes that since his death, the saint has been totally embraced by the Hindus and that in the process the Muslim minority in Shirdi has been eclipsed. [39] He feels that Narasimhaswami was one of those responsible for perpetrating this process of Hinduization. While most of his arguments concerning Sai Baba’s Sufi connections are strong, he provides very little corroboration from the Sai Baba literature itself. For example, there is no evidence that he read Dabholkar’s Sri Sai Saccarita nor that he knew Marathi or the Maharashtrian Bhakti tradition. In fact, no bibliography was given with his monograph.

[38] Kevin R.D. Shepherd, Gurus Rediscovered: Biographies of Sai Baba of Shirdi and Upasani Maharaj of Sakori (Cambridge: Anthropographia Publications, 1985). Shepherd is very opinionated in this book. For example he summarily dismisses Narasimhaswami as an opportunist, whose only interest was in elevating himself through writing the biographies of holy men. (PDF Reference)

Marianne Warren referred to Kevin R.D. Shepherd’s writings as “very opinionated” and emphatically stated that Shepherd’s book had “very little corroboration from the Sai Baba literature itself” and had no supporting bibliography. Kevin Shepherd omitted Marianne Warren’s criticism about him and only snipped out those sections that suited his big ego. Marianne Warren’s views about Kevin R. D. Shepherd were critical and she rightly questioned the objectivity, credibility and integrity of Shepherd’s unsupported, unsourced and subjective claims. So much for Kevin R.D. Shepherd’s boast about following “academic rules in citing sources to a greater extent than many academic philosophers” (PhD Marianne Warren didn’t think so)!

KevinRDShepherd also cited information against Sathya Sai Baba from Marianne Warren (as published by Sai Baba critic and defamer Robert Priddy). It is amusing that Shepherd cited and eulogized the very same woman who condemned him for his subjective, unsupported and opinionated writings!

Unravelling The Enigma – Shirdi Sai Baba In The Light Of Sufism Description:

Unravelling The Enigma-Shirdi Sai Baba in the Light of Sufism is an exciting new piece of research which examines Sai Baba of Shirdi from the standpoint of Islamic mysticism-the Deccani Sufism of 19th century Maharashtra-in order to unravel the mystery surrounding the saint. Sai Baba is consistently described by his Hindu biographers as a Muslim faqir and a mystic, which, by definition, makes him a Sufi. However, no previous researcher has examined him thoroughly in this light.

The author assumes the reader will have some familiarity with previous biographies of Shirdi Sai Baba and reviews incidents, anecdotes and sayings of he hagiography surrounding Sai Baba, in the light of the goals, practices and stories of the Sufis from the golden era of Sufism, and discovers that an amazing similarity and correspondence begins to emerge. Immediately, the more puzzling aspects of the saint’s actions and sayings fall away, and Sai Baba himself becomes more understandable, attractive and lovable.

In the book, Dr Warren brings two new pieces of scholarship to the subject. First she elucidates the English translation of part of the works of some 17th and 18th-century Maharashtrian Sufi poet-saints-their contribution having hitherto been neglected by scholars. Their lives and writings echo the life and teachings of Sai Baba. Secondly, she includes the English translation of the previously untranslated Urdu notebook, jotted down by Abdul, Sai Baba’s faqiri pupil, from teachings based on the Qur’an given to him by his pir Sai Baba. Both these contributions allow us to se into a word hitherto closed, and expand our awareness of the famous miracle-worker of Shirdi.

While Sai Baba has attained a universal appeal, transcending any one sectarian religious tradition, it is necessary to understand his Sufi origins in order to obtain a deeper and fuller appreciation of the enigmatic saint of Shirdi.

A fresh new light is thrown upon the Maharashtrian saint Sai Baba of Shirdi in this rare and fascinating book by Dr Marianne Warren. Discovering that there is a rich history of Sufism in the Deccan in the past, especially at Khuldabad, where there was a large Sufi center, and also at Pathri, Sai Baba’s reputed birthplace, she first explores these areas. Then, in the light of this knowledge, she re-examines the life and teachings of Sai Baba. The results are spectacular. Sai Baba’s previously bizarre or mystic behaviour and enigmatic saying instantly become more understandable. By comprehending the stages of the Sufi path, such facets as Sai Baba’s adherence to the vow of poverty, begging for food until the last few days of his life, fall naturally into place.

The confirmation of Sai Baba’s Sufi status is the discovery and translation of Sai Baba’s faqir servant Adbul’s notebook, written in Urdu. The document contains Abdul’s actual notes and jottings taken while reading the Quran with Sai Baba. From this, it is now possible to state authoritatively that Sai Baba a Sufi Master, and directly taught the precepts of Islam and Sufism to his servant/pupil and probably to a host of wandering faqirs throughout the Deccan in the nineteenth century.

The goal of a Sufi aspirant is to reach God realization to realize his own inner divinity. Shirdi Sai Baba attained this divine status and throughout his life he also played the traditional role of a Sufi Master guiding others along the path.

Table of Contents






– An Overview of the Life of Sai Baba
– Sufi Mysticism and Sai Baba
– The Historical Background: Sufism in Maharashtra
– Sai Baba-the Muslim Faqir
– Sai Baba and the Maharashtrian
– Bhakti Movement-Its Poet-Saints, Mystics and Deities
– Sufi Accommodation to the Hindu Milieu
– Outwardly Different-Inwardly the Same
– Nineteenth Century Sufi Contemporaries of Sai Baba


– Sai Baba and the Sufi Tariqat (path
– Abdul and his Notebook
– English Translation of the Sai Baba MS
– Some Observations of the Saibaba MS


– The Hindu Embrace of Sai Baba
– The Sathya Sai Baba Connection
– Drawing the Threads Together





Conny Larsson And Maharishi Mahesh Yogi

When Did Conny Larsson Become Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s Private Secretary? 1971 or 1973?

“In 1971, I became the guru’s private secretary and travelled with him everywhere – day and night.”

“1973- Private secretary to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi founder of the TM organisation.”

“I was [T.M. founder] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s secretary during the year 1973.”

When Did Conny Larsson Leave Maharishi Mahesh Yogi? 1975 or 1976?

“This was too much for me and I told my master ‘I cannot follow you any longer’. So I left in 1975.”

“I was in despair due to the fact thatI had left my Master Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in 1976…”

Why Did Conny Larsson Leave Maharishi Mahesh Yogi?

Because of charging large sums of money for a certain TM course:

“I was a fairly wealthy person [Mr. Larson was a well-known actor in Sweden in his youth], and joined Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement when I was nineteen years of age. I was his secretary, his masseur, and his night boy, i.e. I guarded him at night. In 1975 we had a difference of opinion due to certain circumstances and when he started charging very large sums of money for a certain Transcendental Meditation course. I decided that this could not be right and I told him so, an asked him to change it or stop it. I gave him four days to think about it, after which I approached him again. He inferred that I was wrong, and he was right. I had not agreed of his practices, and I therefore felt, that I had to leave him.”

Because of organisational reasons:

“When I came to you in 1978 I was in despair due to the fact thatI had left my Master Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in 1976, mostly due to organisational reasons. During my time with him I became his personal secretary and loved the duty to serve a holy man with the best of intentions. Under his supervision I educated myself in Rishikesh 1969 to become a teacher of meditation in the age old Shankaracharya-tradition. His own guru was the Shankaracharya of JyotirMath.”

Because Maharishi allegedly wanted the Nobel Prize for himself, allegedly lied about levitation and a deceptive photo shoot:

“I began to wake up when he declared that Mother Teresa was the worst kind of human being on earth. She later won the Nobel Prize. His main problem with her was that he wanted the Nobel Prize for himself. I was told to manipulate those responsible for choosing the people to be nominated. We tried to do this and succeeded, as he had much influence at that time, to get him nominated but this was blocked by King Olaf of Norway. He then started saying that all his teachers, I was one of them, were soon going to levitate. We were going to fly and we would visit all kinds of planets about which the psychiatrists and other spiritual teachers were always telling us. I realised that this could not be true as I taught these courses. They called it the TM-Sidhi Programme. At these “flying” courses people would be sitting cross-legs on their backsides on their mattresses and they jumped whilst sitting like this. After a while one could become very skilful and could jump up as high as a metre or so only to fall back again. I heard Maharishi tell a French photographer with a slow camera just to cut the “fall back” part and put the photos together when they were “up” which gave a flying image. So he put them together and this was broadcast all over the world. This was too much for me and I told my master “I cannot follow you any longer”. So I left in 1975.”

Because of Maharishi’s alleged sexual acts with women:

“He then used to call one girl every now and then and I always thought he was dictating a letter or something in the middle of the night. The girls that came last in the night never looked happy when she came out from the 30 minutes audience but never thought of it to be a pleasure or sexual meeting. Knowing what I now know I feel just embarrassed that my Master didn’t stand up for his sexual lust or love to women. That would have been perfectly OK with me anyhow. But to hide and lie and create an M-group that I and many other boy belonged to was just a soap opera I now think.Regarding MMY’s guilt, he is all aware of it, for one day after a great f**k on the roof of his villa under the moonlight and in the protection of the mosquito-net he called for Tatwalababa, the naked yogi, for his protection and for his cleansing of the ashram, this was what he explained to the lady he f**ked with. They loved each other for years. Look at the group-picture from one of your photos which MMY did in Rishikesh when you where there, you are in the picture and so are MMY and the women he loved and f**”

Did Dr. Hislop Write Maharishi In 1973?

Conny Larsson claimed:

“I was [T.M. founder] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s secretary during the year 1973. I did not know about Dr. Hislop then. One day that year, a letter came to Maharishi from this Dr. Hislop saying that he could not stay in the TM-movement because now he had met God in the form of the Avatar of Sai, and Hislop thereupon left the Maharishi and the TM movement. Maharishi, who had invested much in Dr. Hislop, appointing him as his first teacher in the western world and even having him become secretary for a while, felt bad. He asked me to write Hislop a letter telling him about the beautiful things that were going on within the TM movement and that Dr. Hislop had his natural place in this. He also asked Hislop not to follow this new master because he was Not the avatar at all. Hislop was told he was now following a dark path.”

Conny’s account is directly contradicted by John Hislop himself in his book “My Baba and I” (in which Hislop said he left Maharishi in 1968, five years prior to Conny’s account).

Conny Larsson Was Maharishi’s Secretary For How Long?

“1973- Private secretary to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi founder of the TM organisation.”

“I was [T.M. founder] Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s secretary during the year 1973.”

Cyprus Today: Used And Abused By Their Gods

Claire Morely: “He served two years as the guru’s personal secretary.”

According to Mark Landau, Conny Larsson only served a few weeks as Maharishi’s personal secretary. Landau claimed:

“In my memory, Conny’s time on the job was limited to a few weeks — i was surprised at how short he lasted, though, in retrospect, i would mark that up to his integrity, sensitivity and what he saw from the get go.”

As with Sathya Sai Baba, Conny Larsson’s stories about Maharishi Mahesh Yogi have changed, progressing from fairly innocuous claims to highly defamatory ones. Why?

Since Conny Larsson self-disclosed his psychiatric diagnosis made by a psychiatrist of him being “psychoinfantile” (which is also known as Histrionic Personality Disorder), Moreno contends that Conny Larsson’s self-disclosed history of his life-time involvement with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and deprogrammers might explain why he now claims to be a psychic medium who hears “spirit voices” in his head and who claims to see and communicate with dead people and dead animals (Ref).


Gerald Joe Moreno Archives

Gerald Joe Moreno Categories